SAFETY TIPS OR VICTIM BLAMING

I’m a true believer in offering varying points of view. I feel they further discussion on important topics. We may not always agree, but different opinions give us all the opportunity to gain new vantage points and potentially shift our positions on specific topics.

The below email was sent by Sally. Her Twitter handle is @arthurstodgyn. It has been re-posted in this blog in its UNedited form and in its entirety, WITH her permission. My response to her writing will be found at the conclusion of her email to me. Thank you again Sally for reminding us about information that sometimes gets lost in the discourse taking place on this topic.

To those readers of this blog – - please try to read Sally’s email from a non-judgmental point of view. It’s people like her that are doing WAY more than just sitting on the side-lines commenting about the game. I don’t agree with every point she’s made, but it’s very clear her writing was extremely well thought out and presented.

Email:

Dear Richard,

I have an idea for how to end rape: stop people raping.

Your approach is to blame the victims. Let me explain using examples from your tweets:

“Tip 52: Girls walking home from school should always walk with another person.

Imagine a situation where a school girl walking home alone is raped. You’ve just given the rapist and their supporters a convenient get-out clause: “She was walking alone. It was her fault”.

“Tip  37: If riding public transportation, ride as close to the front of the bus or train as possible.”

In this victim-blaming scenario one can say “the silly woman rode in the wrong part of the bus”. If only she’d stayed at the front of the bus, or: if only her rapist had decided not to rape her.

I see that you have responded to some of the criticism of your tips on Twitter with words such as “Sorry you feel that way. We’re all just trying to make a positive difference”. The problem is that you are making a *negative* difference by excusing rapists – and the majority of men, with words like “Most men don’t just go away.” – - by using victim-blaming language that suggests it’s women’s (incidentally, men and those with non-binary gender identity can be raped too) responsibility to avoid being raped and not men’s (incidentally, women and those with non-binary gender identity can perpetrate rape too) responsibility to avoid raping. This actually gives a free pass to those considering raping (“go ahead, it’s their fault they aren’t protecting themselves properly”), and gives the friends and family of a perpetrator an easy way to avoid the uncomfortable realization that someone they like and/or love did a terrible thing (“it was her fault. She shouldn’t have been jogging with earphones”).

Thank you for reading this far. I’ve pointed out the serious problems with your approach and am hopeful that you are genuinely interested in making a positive difference rather than perpetuating victim-blaming. This is what you can do to have a positive impact:

Teach people not to rape.

Tell your audience that their bodies are their own and others may not touch them without permission and that they must respect the bodily autonomy of others. Tell them that an absence of “no” is not the same as “yes”. Tell them that consent under pressure is not consent. Tell them that everyone has the right to withdraw their consent to sexual activity at any time, however far along you are. Tell them that there are never any circumstances when someone owes them an orgasm. Tell them that consent to a certain activity on one occasion does not equal consent to do that activity again. Tell them that sleeping on public transport does not make someone available for sex. Tell them that erect tissue does not substitute for consent. Tell them that a lack of resistance does not substitute for consent. Tell them that someone who identifies as (for example) kinky/a slut/gay/a swinger/polyamorous/bi/queer, or wears a skirt/makeup/heels, or is drunk at a sex party in your bed has to give active consent before you can touch them. Tell them that consent to (for example) penis-in-vagina sex is not consent to oral sex, that consent to one particular sexual act is not consent to another sexual act. Tell them about power dynamics: that factors such as physical strength, gender, education, race, social class, financial power, and social status can skew a power dynamic so that a person may find it difficult to withhold consent. Tell them that when they are in a power position it is their responsibility to make sure the consent they receive would still be consent if the power dynamic didn’t exist. Teach them to be mindful of power dynamics and the steps they must take to mediate them. Tell them that consent to sex with a condom is not consent to sex without a condom. Tell them that consent when you have withheld facts that may mean they would not give consent if they had known them (for example that you have an STI or you are cheating on a partner) is not consent. Tell them about the consequences of rape, for both the survivor and the perpetrator, and their family and friends… The list could go on and on. I hope you get the idea.

You are in a very strong position: as a male role model you can educate other males (and maybe some women and genderqueer/genderfluid/intersex people too) not to rape.

I look forward to reading your reply.

Yours,

Sally Russell

MY RESPONSE:

One thing I state to many people is the very fine line that must be walked when presenting safety tips so as to NOT inadvertently crossover into blaming the victim for the crime. Rape and Sexual Assault (SA) are the only 2 crimes I know of that the victims must CONSTANTLY prove that a crime was actually committed and who must continually defend themselves against a public that is all-too-quick to blame them for having caused the crime to come about in the first place.

In a perfect world, rape and sexual assault would someday disappear. The problem is, there are certain people who just aren’t good people. Some call these people sociopaths, others call them A**holes, but whatever we choose to term them, they are people who for all practical purposes, do not care AT ALL about how their actions and/or words impact those with whom they come in contact.

Robbers, burglars, rapists, and other bad guys have been with us since the dawn of man. There is NOTHING that leads me to believe they will one day magically disappear, thereby enabling us: to leave our purses in our cars with rolled down windows and unlocked doors; to no longer fear walking alone at night or through a “bad” neighborhood; to park our bikes outside grocery stores without being chained to trees; etc.

Are we (myself and many others) trying to cause a shift in the culture? Absolutely! The actions of people like Sally and thousands of others will definitely reduce the incidence of rape and sexual assault throughout the world. The problem is approximately 20% of rapes and sexual assaults take place where the victim does NOT know her/his attacker. These attacks are committed by Serial Assailants. Serial Assailants will NEVER just “not rape,” no more than serial pedophiles will just not commit crimes against children, and no more than robbers will just stop robbing. These people don’t have the tiniest ounce of humanity to be concerned with their victims. They are committing crimes in spite of the potential of spending life in prison or receiving other forms of punishment for their crimes. These people will NEVER say, “Gee I think I just won’t rape anyone ever again.” They aren’t wired like that.

The culture shift we (Sally and the rest of us) are seeking is that which impacts the Situational Assailant (oftentimes occurring through date rape). The Situational Assailant commits the crimes of Rape and SA, because of mood, timing, thought processes, current environmental factors, etc. Many of these attacks could potentially be prevented through organized efforts to put these individuals in touch with the actual damage they are causing their victims. Many of these offenders would NEVER want their mothers, their sisters, or their girlfriends to be raped or sexually assaulted, yet somehow it’s okay for them to perpetrate these acts upon other people’s mothers and daughters. This is the consciousness shift we must work towards.

This being said, it is incumbent upon all parents to not only spread the word to bring about a shift in culture, but to still do everything in our power to protect our daughters from the criminal element – - whether robbers, burglars, or rapists.

The tips I provide are merely tips. The printer of my books once told me, “Richard, these books aren’t just preventing sexual assault books – they’re excellent crime prevention books.” I responded, “I know. These strategies are victim avoidance strategies – - some of which apply to young women, some of which apply to 50 year-old men. But I’m writing because a 14 year-old girl, or boy for that matter, does not have the life experiences to recognize potentially bad or dangerous situations. This information is for them.”

My tips are not intended to EVER allow a perpetrator of ANY crime to make the claim, “Well just look at what she was wearing.” Or “She was walking on the wrong side of the street.”

My tips are in NO WAY ever meant to lead any person to believe that if a woman had only done such and such she would not have been raped. When one woman’s window is locked at night, a Serial Assailant (predator) will merely move to the next residence and the one after that until he finds the UNlocked window.

Self-defense, safety tips, and other things we do to protect ourselves from the criminal element absolutely does NOT mean that when we fail to do these things we are giving permission to bad guys to commit crimes against us.

But we MUST acknowledge that people know they shouldn’t be waiving wads of cash around because they may be robbed; we know not to leave our purses in unlocked cars. But the second we tell a young woman, “It’s not safe to trail jog alone” suddenly we are victim-blaming, or at the very least, implying that IF something does happen to her – - “See. She didn’t follow my advice.”

I have NEVER done this. Nor would I EVER.

NOTHING gives a man the right to lay his hands on ANY woman or child.

But given the violent world we live in, at a certain level we must take steps and precautions to ensure our safety.

As parents, we have a duty to our children to protect them from criminals; not just close our eyes and say things such as “Tell the drug dealer to ‘stop dealing drugs’” – - instead of warning our children on the dangers of drug use. “Tell the burglar to ‘stop breaking into homes’” – - instead of locking our doors and windows at night or when we go out. “Tell the rapist ‘just don’t rape’” – - instead of taking steps to ensure our personal safety.

What parent will say, “Oh tell men just don’t rape” while at the same time NOT telling her daughter that it’s not safe to walk alone, it’s not safe to be out late at night, it’s not safe to do this or do that.

We try to protect our kids by making them wear helmets when they ride bikes, wear jackets when it’s cold, to not play with fire, to not smoke or use drugs, but suddenly when we try to warn them about how their actions can potentially result in a sexual assault, we are engaging in victim-blaming – - or worse yet, excusing the behaviors of violent criminals.

If a bad guy were to pull a gun on my daughter I would DEFINITELY want her to know EXACTLY what to do – - so that she is neither raped NOR killed – - which is the outcome in 95% of the occurrences where guns are involved in female abductions. I don’t want my daughter or anyone else’s to die because she didn’t know what to do in such a situation. And I will risk being called a victim-blamer LONG before I will stop speaking the message of keeping young women out of harm’s way.

Do I want and hope for a shift in culture? Absolutely! Am I willing to ignore common sense actions that people could take to avoid being victimized by bad people? ABSOLUTELY NOT.

Sally’s writing ends with a long paragraph about the conversations in and around rape and sexual assault. Her points in this paragraph are BEYOND REPROACH. Young women need to be taught that in EVERY CASE their bodies belong to them. And young men need to be taught that in NO CASE is it EVER acceptable to breach another person’s right to exercise personal boundaries.

[NOTE: I do realize men are victimized along with trans-genders and others. However, female victims make up almost 100% of all rapes and sexual assaults. And young women, aged 14 to 23, make up 75% of these - - at least in America. I needed to try to reach the largest group impacted by these crimes. This does not make commission of these crimes by or against people other than women any more acceptable.]

Thank you for your email Sally. It was a reminder that I don’t address these topics nearly enough.

I look to the day where women no longer have to even think about the other half of the population as being potential aggressors.

Best to all and Stay Safe.

Richard

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

COULD THIS HAVE BEEN PREVENTED? Man gains access through open window in middle of night rapes woman.

THE STORY: Upper East Side. Middle of the night. Man climbs in through window 27 year woman wakes up during the process of being raped.

COULD THIS HAVE BEEN PREVENTED: This one is probably going to have aLOT of people saying, “Of course it could have been prevent. Close the window!” In my book, Preventing Sexual Assault: 171 Ways, an entire chapter is devoted to safety in the home.

There are several issues here so sit back. I will ask certain questions or make certain points and address each as a separate item.

1) How many of us sleep with our windows open instead of running the air conditioning? I say “us” because I am one of these people.

In this particular case, many of the units in this part of town have what are known as window gates. Picture a metal gate that can be opened or closed and you get the idea. The problem is many people leave these gates open, making for easy access to rapists, burglars or other criminals.

I always tell people that they should NEVER leave first floor windows open. If you are going to leave a sliding door or window open leave it no more than maybe 6 or 7 inches and make sure the window or door can be locked into position.

I suggest that if there is easy access to 2nd stories – - such as is the case with many townhouse style homes, that people apply the same rules.

2) I have a screen on my window. So even though the window is open, I would hear someone trying to pull the screen off.

Right and wrong. Yes, most people would be awakened by an intruder attempting to remove a screen. HOWEVER, something as simple as a pen knife (small knife with a blade of less than an inch or two) can easily cut through most screens. Intruders don’t want to go through the hassle or the risk of waking occupants by trying to remove the screens – - they just take 10 seconds to cut the screen out and climb in.

If you are relying on a screen to stop and intruder at least hang some type of noisemaker in or near enough that if the screen is removed or someone climbs in, noise will be made and hopefully they will be scared off.

Best practice: assume the screen is not even there. Would you still feel comfortable being asleep? If the answer is “no” then do not leave your window open more than several inches and make sure it is locked into position.

3) One of the residents commented that she was keeping a baseball bat next to her bed “just in case.”

It makes no difference if you have a bat or even a gun, when we are in REM sleep, very little is going to wake us up. By the time you realize an intruder is in your room, it’s already too late. Do not count on weapons to keep you safe. Make sure these people can’t get into your home to begin with.

Further, in many situations weapons end up being used against the homeowner. They are valuable in situations where, let’s say someone has accessed the downstairs part of your home but has not yet gained access to your bedroom. But even in this case, having a lock on your bedroom door and calling 911 is still your best bet.

Somewhere in America a woman is raped approximately every 35 seconds. A couple more are sexually assaulted. And while approximately 80% of these occur where the victim knows her assailant, that still leaves a HUGE number where the victim does NOT.

Whether attempting to prevent rape or any other type of home intrusion crime, make sure windows that can be easily accessed remain closed and locked or locked into open positions of no more than 6 or 7 inches.

Your comments or ideas on safety tips you’ve heard??

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

FROM TIME TO TIME I AM ASKED TO TALK ABOUT RAPE SCENES IN MOVIES AND ON TV.

With publicity ramping up for the yet-to-be release of a movie containing a particularly violent rape scene, I chose today to respond.

There are 2 types of rape scenes. The first glamorizes rape and the second attempts to depict it in all it’s violence and tragedy.

In the movie The Passion of Christ, we saw Jesus tortured and killed. While the experience of watching this was moving for Christians and non-Christians alike, things can be taken too far.

In court rooms, prosecutors often avoid using color photographs of victims who have experienced savage physical attacks. Studies have shown that juries are turned off by such photographs and will actually lose favor for the prosecution/victim because of what they feel to be excessive prosecutorial zeel. In other words, juries feel that a prosecutor is somehow trying to paint the case so as to get a conviction “at all costs.” Juries don’t like this and will respond to it by coming back with not-guilty verdicts even in cases where guilt is evident.

I met a young woman once who said she fantasized about being raped. I responded, “Really?” I then walked up behind her and without touching her, whispered 7 words into her ear. He body trembled. I asked her if she was still interested in experiencing being raped. She said, “No.”

It is virtually impossible to truly exhibit rape in all its badness since much of the fallout experienced through this crime is psychological in nature. So while the actual criminal act can be depicted, it fails to do justice to the true brutality of the crime itself.

Next there are shows or movies that will display rapes and sexual assaults for their entertainment value. “Entertainment value” refers to part of a story or part of a story line. Again, the actual depiction fails to connect viewers to the true savagery of such attacks and it therefore leaves them with this sense of “sexual assault isn’t really that big of a deal.” The majority of these depictions merely serve (albeit in many cases, inadvertently) to minimize the true nature of rape and sexual assault.

Add to the above situation, story lines where the victim ends up falling in love with and marrying her attacker and you have entered a completely new realm of disconnect between the writers of these shows and real life. Could you picture being robbed by 3 or 4 men, who then savagely beat you using baseball bats and knives? You lose one of your eyes from the attack. You experiencing brain damage and other visible scars from the attack. Well multiply this times 100 and you might start to see how it is INSANE to think that a rape victim could ever fall in love with her attacker.

Do I think rape scenes should be shown in movies or on TV? No – - not really. Such depictions fail to ever capture the true brutality of this crime. And because of this, the crime is minimized in the eyes of the viewers.

In his study titled The Mental Health Impact of Rape, Dean Kilpatrick, Ph.D., found the following:
Almost one-third of rape victims experienced post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).
Rape victims were 3 times more likely than women who were not victims of a violent crime to experience a major depressive episode.
A victim of rape was 13 times more likely than a non-crime victim to have attempted suicide.
1 in 8 rape victims has attempted suicide.
Rape victims were 13 times more likely to have a problem with alcohol.
Rape victims were 26 times more likely to have some type of drug abuse problem.

Can the true nature of rape and/or sexual assault be depicted on either the big or small screen? No.

YOUR THOUGHTS??

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

STORY OF THE WEEK – - ATTEMPTING TO HIDE BEHIND “RELIGIOUS FREEDOM” FAILS. Warren Jeffs gets 120 years.

Well the verdict AND SENTENCING are in. Warren Jeffs was convicted of sexual assault of a 12 year old girl and sentenced to 120 years. Jeffs is 55 so the odds are pretty good that he will spend the remaining years of his life in prison.

THE STORY: Warren Jeffs splits off from the Mormon Church. He forms his own sect known as the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints. This “church” has approximately 10,000 followers in the United States.

The primary complaint against this church was that it promoted “marriages” between older men and MUCH younger women (teenage girls).

The problem is these girls were in no position to prevent or report the abuse.

Dozens of other men have been indicted on sexual assault of a child, bigamy and other related charges. Eight of these men have already been convicted on felony charges.

HIDING BEHIND RELIGIOUS “FREEDOM”

One of Jeff’s primary positions was authorities had no right to prosecute based on his rights under the First Amendment – - the right to exercise freedom of religion without government interference. The jury of 10 women and 2 men, didn’t buy it.

Whether this “church” or the Catholic Church, nobody gets to hide behind the cloak of religious freedom to violate the law – - especially when it pertains to the rape and/or sexual assault of innocent children.

COULD THIS HAVE BEEN PREVENTED: in this particular case – - NO. The girls were innocent victims and the church existed in an extremely remote region. The only people who were aware of the abuse were the victims, the perpetrators, and other “believers.”

WHAT’S YOUR OPINION? Was 120 years too light of a sentence??

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

ASSANGE, WIKILEAKS FOUNDER, EXTRADITION FOR RAPE ORDERED – - what is rape??

While I believe much of what is happening to Julian Assange is political; and while I find it noteworthy that neither woman came forward until she found out there was another woman; this case gives me the opportunity to comment on and define rape.

Even though we are dealing with a foreign country, Sweden, the definition of rape is still the same: unwanted or unknown intercourse.
Unwanted would be were a woman says no and she is forced into intercourse either by someone she knows or someone unknown to her. Rape CAN occur even between a boyfriend and a girlfriend, 2 strangers who have already had consensual sex, and in some regions a husband and a wife.
Unknown sex occurs where the victim has passed out or is asleep (as is the situation with Assange). In this situation the area is a little more grey. Husband and wife/boyfriend and girlfriend – - probably somehow acceptable (see also legal), casual acquaintance/casual encounter more than likely NOT okay/legal. Meet a girl at a party, she passes out, you have sex with her – - in many regions you have committed a rape AND I AGREE WITH THIS POSITION.

A 3rd area of rape is Statutory Rape. This is where any person has intercourse with another person under the age of 18 (in most areas of the United States) and as low as 16 in some regions/countries. A boyfriend and girlfriend both aged 15 having consensual sex could result in a prosecution of Statutory Rape – - not likely, but it can happen. We see prosecutions for this crime more when dealing with a man over the age of 18 have sex with a girl usually under the age of 16 (even if the law says the cutoff is 18 not 16). I do not consider Statutory Rape and act of rape since it is almost always consensual. And many provinces term it Unlawful Sex as opposed to Statutory Rape since the word “rape” usually has very specific connotations – - especially in the legal realm. I’m still NOT okay with men over 18 having sex with girls under 18, but I’m also not okay with terming them rapists.

Is Assange guilty of the charges? I’m not sure. He does not seem to argue that he was having sex with these women and in Sweden, unprotected sex when one party has requested protected sex, is also considered an act of rape – - so he may very well be guilty. Is this politically driven? HIGHLY LIKELY. But breaking the law is breaking the law and the mere fact that 1 person is prosecuted for the exact “crime” that someone else was not prosecuted for, does not make commission of the act okay and/or legal. Think of it like speeding – - just because everyone is doing it does not make it okay nor does it mean you can’t, or won’t, get a ticket.

That’s it for today.

Stay Safe.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

COULD THIS HAVE BEEN PREVENTED – - a precaution that both women AND MEN should take

THE STORY: 4am. A woman is stopped at a red light. She is accosted by 2 gun-wielding men. We do NOT know how she was accosted but you will see my assumptions below. They car-jack the vehicle with her in it. They sexually assault her. Drop her on a corner and take off in her vehicle.

COULD THIS HAVE BEEN PREVENTED: the men gained access to this woman’s vehicle in 1 of 2 ways:
1) she was driving with her doors unlocked, so they opened the door, showed her a gun and ordered her to drive.
2) she was stopped, her doors WERE locked, but when they produced a gun and told her to open the door – - she complied.
Whether to prevent a car-jacking, assault, or even a mere robbery attempt, it is ALWAYS a good idea to drive with the doors locked and windows up – - especially at night. This prevents someone from just getting into your vehicle.
But you say, “Richard, my windows were rolled up and the doors were locked. The man tapped his gun against the glass and told me to open the door. What was I supposed to do – - let him shoot me?” This gets into a 2nd arena. The majority of people showing weapons are not interested in USING the weapon. The weapon is an intimidator intended to get someone to do what the criminal wants (hand over money, accompany them to a remote location, etc.) – - in this case it was “give me your car” and subsequently the woman with it.

You’re stopped at a red light. It’s 4 am (in other words no cars). SOMEONE TAPS A GUN ON YOUR WINDOW. YOU HIT THE GAS PEDAL, RUN THE RED LIGHT AND CALL THE POLICE. It’s highly unlikely the person is going to start shooting. And given that many female abductions result in the murder of the woman, driving away and having the criminal shooting at me is a risk I would take.

HOWEVER this brings me to an important point. I see many drivers pull up to a red light or stop sign behind another car and they pull RIGHT UP to the other car’s bumper. You always want to be able to see the other car’s rear wheels touching the ground. By being able to see this, you will have created a safe distance between your car and the one in front of you.
• This gap permits you to get around the car in front of you if it stalls or is stalled.
• It enables you to get around the car if the driver tries to get out and attack you for any reason.
• And, last but not least, it creates a buffer zone so that in the event you are rear ended, you are less likely to slam into the car in front of you.

This woman was lucky. Normally when a woman is taken in a vehicle, she is killed. This particular case also supports a point I make in my book, which is if a man is robbed, the robber takes the victim’s wallet and/or watch and takes off, but when a crime is committed against a woman, it is not unusual for it to turn into some type of sexual assault.

Stay alert and stay safe.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

COULD THIS HAVE BEEN PREVENTED – - sexual assault near university

THE STORY: A 20 year old college woman walking to a friend’s house at 1 am is approached by 2 men. They force her into an alley and sexually assault her. Good news is the attack was interrupted by 2 passersby and the predators fled the scene. (“Good news” because she wasn’t killed.)

COULD THIS HAVE BEEN PREVENTED: I have a friend who loves to trail ride (on a bike). I’ve told her a number of times she canNOT be riding alone “on these trails.” One time she said, “I’ll be fine.” Another time she said, “I’m on a bike; what could an attacker do?” To which I responded, “All he has to do is push you off your bike. It takes no work and no effort. And since other riders are so scarce (she normally rides in the middle of weekdays) you’re at the total mercy of your attacker.”
In this situation, we have a 20 year old woman in a downtown area walking alone. Is she asking for it?? Absolutely NOT! But downtown districts are not the safest places in the world even for men. In these situations, there are 2 types of victims. The first: the victim who perceives no threats – - like my bike-riding friend. The second: the person who thinks it won’t happen to them. I’ll speak with women and they’ll say, “You gotta tell my daughter that running alone on trails is not safe.” To which I respond, “I will; but odds are it will not stop her. When you tell her to not run alone, I’ll bet she says, ‘quit worrying about me mom. I’ll be fine.’” And the mom always confirms this.

Somewhere in America a woman is raped approximately every 35 seconds. A couple more are sexually assaulted. And while approximately 80% of these occur where the victim knows her assailant, that still leaves a HUGE number where the victim does NOT know her assailant.

The world has changed and crimes of all types have intruded into every enclave – - even those that used to be considered safe.

This woman might have asked someone else to walk with her. She might have asked her friends to come and pick her up. Or she might have taken a cab. This is not about chiding her for not doing these things; it’s about trying to keep one’s self out of harm’s way.

Stay safe.

Richard

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

IMPORTANT LESSONS from a DFSA (drug facilitated sexual assault) in Canada

THE STORY: 2 doctors arrested on Feb. 19, 2011. A 23-year old woman, who KNEW one of the doctors, was seeking “career guidance.” She met him and a friend at a bar in downtown Toronto. She claimed they took her to a 2nd bar where a substance was placed into her drink. She was then taken to a local hotel and sexually assaulted by both men. At the bail hearing, the prosecution brought a 2nd victim into the court who stated she had been assaulted on a different occasion by 1 of the 2 men. The bail hearing was cancelled (no bail) pending review of the new allegation.

I WILL NOT BE DOING A “COULD THIS HAVE BEEN PREVENTED.”
Instead I want to address several important issues surrounding this case.

1) More than 80% of all sexual assaults take place in situations where the victim knows the assailant. (Source: U.S. Department of Justice) While this case is developing in Canada, there is no reason to think the statistics are much different for that region.
LESSON 1: Just because you know someone casually, does not mean you KNOW them well enough to automatically assume they can be trusted. I HATE that I am contributing to the overall paranoia surrounding sexual assaults, but these days it is absolutely essential, that all women acknowledge the truth of LESSON 1. Both of these men are doctors. Both of them are probably reasonably respected in the community. In the mug shots, 1 of them is a pretty good looking guy and they other might be if he didn’t have a few days’ beard growth. Tall, dark and handsome DOES NOT EQUAL trustworthy!

2) In sexual assaults committed in America, approximately 65% of the men were drugging or drinking and almost 60% of the women were doing the same.
LESSON 2: When meeting someone that you do not know extremely well for “drinks” – - skip the alcohol. You will see why in the next item.

3) No matter what type of drug has been ingested, short of an actual knockout drug that renders the victim immediately unconscious, there is oftentimes a period between the time the drug was received and the time the victim loses control or consciousness.
LESSON 3: You’ve only had 1 or 2 drinks and suddenly you feel sick or like you are losing control of your faculties. IMMEDIATELY call out to a bartender, manager, bouncer or police officer that you think you’ve been drugged and you need their help. DO NOT ALLOW ANYONE ELSE TO GIVE YOU A RIDE OR INSURE YOUR WELL-BEING (unless it’s a girlfriend who accompanied you to the location). The person offering assistance is almost always the person who has administered the drug.

4) Coming forward requires bravery – - especially in America where the VICTIM IS GENERALLY CONSIDERED GUILTY UNTIL PROVEN TRUSTWORTHY (except in cases involving unknown assailants). Being a man, I cannot comment on the pain experienced by a rape or sexual assault. I cannot comment on the “reliving” of the attack. I cannot comment on the difficulty of coming forward (which often has shame attached to it – - even though it shouldn’t).
BUT I CAN SAY, the sooner a victim comes forward: a. the more likely evidence is preserved; b. the more likely the victim’s story will be believed; c. the more likely other women will come forward (we saw this just the other day in San Jose California); and, d. the more likely the perpetrators of these crimes can be stopped from victimizing more women.

Here is a link to the original article I read regarding this matter: http://www.torontosun.com/news/torontoandgta/2011/02/19/17340181.html

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

COULD THIS HAVE BEEN PREVENTED – - gang rape by college baseball players

THE STORY: A criminal trial of 1 man (former college baseball player at DeAnza College located in San Jose California. A civil lawsuit against 5 additional men. A woman claims that when she was 18 or 19 she was gang raped by a group of then, DeAnza College Students. A 2nd woman has now come forward stating that 10 weeks before this incident she was raped by 1 or more of the same men at a different party but in the same house and the same room as the plaintiff.

All men claim innocence but what was noteworthy was that during the gang rape attack, the victim was saved by a group of soccer player women who basically broke the door down to rescue their friend from the attackers. The soccer player women were hailed as heroes by the City of San Jose.

DEFENDANTS CLAIM – - consensual sex. This is almost ALWAYS the claim made by any attacker. It is then up to the police to gather witnesses and evidence to the contrary. Given that the victim had to actually be rescued by her friends, I think we can assume the story pretty much went the way the prosecution is telling it.

1 in 4 to 1 in 5 college women will be sexually assaulted during their tenures as students. This statistic is provided by the United States Department of Justice.

We do not know that either of these women were college students because their names have been withheld. Both however, were teenagers at the time of the assaults. Both attended, on separate occasions, what is pretty much your standard college party. Massive amounts of free alcohol to any person in attendance – - especially women.

RESPONSE

Rape is rape. Whether a woman is taken by force or has been drugged or is passed out drunk, rape is rape. In these environments, young women are looking to have fun at a party – - NOT be raped. And while some may point the finger at the young women (both teenagers at the time of the attacks), the bottom line is that they did not provoke the attack any more than someone taking money out of an ATM provokes a robbery.

HOWEVER, young women need to understand that they must take precautions in these situations. They MUST watch out for each other. It is clear that many men at this age cannot be trusted and given this situation, women need to take care of one another. Alcohol or drugs are present in either the male or female or both in more than 55% of all sexual assaults. Given this fact, it is incumbent upon women to watch their alcohol intake. Further, in these free-for-all type party situations, women can easily be served drinks laced with GHB or any number of other drugs that will complete disable them.

THE THING THAT BUGS ME THE MOST is that the schools KNOW THIS IS GOING ON yet are doing virtually nothing to stop it. They claim they are doing everything in their power – - but in reality they are doing almost nothing. Rape and sexual assault of young women still appears to be a right of passage. At what point will we start holding the people who permit these crimes to continue responsible – - in addition to the attackers themselves?

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

WAS Inés Sainz of TV Azteca “ASKING FOR IT?”

BY NOW EVERYONE KNOWS HER NAME.

THE STORY: Good looking and all around fun person, Inés Sainz of TV Azteca, is in the New York Jets’ locker room and unknown (“unknown” because we have not been told what they were), inappropriate comments were made by multiple team members to her.

Sainz tells a story. We really don’t know exactly what was said.
If sexually explicit, harassing type language was used by players on Sainz = not okay.
If 1 (or more) of the players thought she was attractive and asked her out = no violation of anything.
Players have no less and no more rights than anyone else, to ask someone out. And whether or not the recipient of the communication wants to be asked out by me or anyone else, we still have the right to ask – - ask long as it is not in a threatening, harassing or aggressive nature.

THERE ARE A FEW IMPORTANT ISSUES HERE:

1) We do not know truth of the exact words. So we’re kind of stuck. Was she harassed or was someone merely asking a cute woman for a date?

2) People have said that because of how Sainz uses her looks or her sexuality, that if something inappropriate did happen, she should have known it was likely and if she didn’t want that type of “predictable” response, she should down play her looks or actions.
If a woman poses in Playboy, and a stalker rapes her, was she asking for it?
The answer is: No Woman “Asks” To Be Raped – - EVER!!
And whether or not Sainz uses her natural gifts of beauty and/or personality to get ahead, no person has the right to break rules or laws in response to that.

3) If I were a male reporter, would I be allowed to be in the U.S. Women’s Soccer Team locker after a game? I think we all know the answer to this. But this is NOT a conversation about equal treatment. If women have just as much right as men to be in the locker rooms of football players or any other professional male athletic organizations, then NO ONE should be allowed in the locker room. Let the guys shower and dress in peace, interview after they exit the primary locker room to exterior interview areas.

SO WHERE DOES THIS LEAVE US?

NO WOMAN “asks” to be harassed, raped, or assaulted, any more than someone driving a nice car asks to be car-jacked, someone carrying a purse asks to be purse-snatched, or some 6-year old girl playing in her front yard “asks” to be kidnapped. The reason rape and sexual assault are runaway crimes in the world and on college campuses is because of this ongoing perception that the victims have brought the attacks on through their actions or words. When the public truly understands this is not the case, people will stand up and say, “It is not okay for a woman to be raped every 35 seconds in America.”

YOUR THOUGHTS??

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment